Have you seen this video from CNN? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pSOrjf4eAC0, liberal framing aside, pegging him as a "Pro-Putin Propaganda Machine", it shows first hand just how silly Hinkel is and his "communist" movement is. I mean, just look at this screenshot:
Invoking imagery of the "founding fathers" of the USA as part of your Communist Movement should INSTANTLY disqualify you from the running. This isn't the only instance that they do this, either. In their own party "Constitution" the second line states the following:
The Party upholds and strives to deepen the American revolutionary tradition beginning in 1776 and for the construction of a sovereign and united Republic of, by, and for the American people.
In what context, except to identify the "revolution" of 1776 as a bourgeois revolution, is it beneficial to invoke the American Revolution as part of your communist program? It should be plainly obvious to any of us that the American project was one, of the Landed Class, by the Landed Class, and for the Landed Class. This is what is meant by "we the people", the landed people, the mercantile people, the slave owning, capital holding people. I could go on and on.
I love this pitch from the one guy in a tank top at their Palestine event:
Interviewer: So are you are you a mega communist?
Charm Hole: Absolutely I'm a MAGA Communist. I used to hate Trump I would call him.... not sure if I'm allowed to cuss or say bad things...
Int: No you can cuss, yeah, yeah
CH: well yeah no I used to call him a pedophile illiterate [ ] stuff like that cuz I was a big Bernie bro, and I was like, I'll do anything for Bernie, anything right and that's why I love these guys because they just assume you're smart, they're going to tell you all the smartest stuff, and if you don't get it, then you're just going to miss out on the next big thing which hopefully is MAGA Communism or at least America's form of Communism.
This sounds a hell of a lot like every lead up to a crypto rug pull I've ever heard before.
It is funny listening to the liberal host talking about the "issues" here because his chief complaint is that Hinkle is some kind of "Agent of the East" type nonsense. Any communist should be able to tell you the difference between Russia and China when it comes to where they sit in Geopolitical Economy. It should be clear to comrades that, support for Russia in the geopolitical space is one of *critical* support, in the sense that, they exist as a capitalist power seeking its own form of capitalist domination, which places it in contradiction with western capitalist interests. Their aims and goals drain resources from each other. The alignment of Russia and China is, in this poster's opinion, one of convenience for China and Russia because they both stand against western aggression for their own reasons. However, do not think if Russia's oligarchical class get its way and gain full first class status in the western financial system, that they wouldn't change tone and tenner regarding China and its Communist model. Maybe I'm wrong on that one, but they are two very different countries, with two very different economic systems. They *should,* by all accounts, not be friendly, yet their shared history has placed them in similar positions against the USA/NATO/The West, however you want to categorize it.
Yet when you listen to Hinkel talk about Russia and China, you would get the impression that he's forgotten that the USSR fell in 1991.